Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as IT100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung SL820, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was released 2 years after the SL820 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the SL820 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung SL820. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung SL820
| EX-ZR100 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| SL820 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL820
| EX-ZR100 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 has exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has dimensions of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung SL820 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the SL820.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and SL820 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and SL820.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of images though you will want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-ZR100 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL820 |
| Also Known as | - | IT100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $280 |
