Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Also Known as ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR100 was unveiled 24 months later than the TL225 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR100 grades vs the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Samsung TL225. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-ZR100 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| TL225 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung TL225
| EX-ZR100 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the TL225.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and TL225.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP so you should expect comparable quality of images although you should always consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR100 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called as | - | ST550 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 187 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $488 |
