Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/109d1/109d1949782e31ac5d25697e8a75aabcf5d97273" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-ZR100 was revealed 3 years earlier than the WB2200F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the WB2200F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR100 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR100
WB2200F | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR100 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85a7b/85a7b8fe08813288330945b5bd9d13fba1ff0da9" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61fd4/61fd4ff7ece5593b0899e6d9442dbe00505ba1e0" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and WB2200F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to give greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc1c2/dc1c2231fdf11fe19ed0e199b1bf79e1c738c6ba" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/328bf/328bfd18ae42c60fedc3e0e87907bb58a1c21122" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 grams (0.45 pounds) | 708 grams (1.56 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $599 |