Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung WB30F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR100 was announced 17 months before the WB30F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the WB30F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR100 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WB30F | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR100 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the WB30F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and WB30F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and WB30F.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB30F to show greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB30F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lb) | 128 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $180 |
