Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR100 was brought out 17 months earlier than the WB800F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR100 matches up against the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WB800F | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR100 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the WB800F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and WB800F.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to offer greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $300 |