Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Replacement is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was manufactured 8 years after the SD9 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Sigma SD9
| EX-ZR100 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | November 2002 | More modern by 106 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 130k | Crisper screen (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| SD9 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Sigma SD9
| EX-ZR100 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR100 and the SD9.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and SD9 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and SD9.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR100 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Casio EX-ZR100 will offer extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR100 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Sigma SD9 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2002-11-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 3MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $3,001 |