Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") feature different sensor sizes.

The EX-ZR1000 was revealed 3 years after the Fujifilm F200EXR which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 scores against the Fujifilm F200EXR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR1000
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features outside dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 90 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR1000 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR1000 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR1000 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2009-04-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $572 | $350 |