Clicky

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200

Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
  • Launched September 2012
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-ZR1000 was launched 15 months earlier than the Fujifilm S9200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR1000 scores against the Fujifilm S9200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Fujifilm S9200

		

		

			
 EX-ZR1000 Fujifilm S9200 
Focus manually  Very exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-ZR1000

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9200 EX-ZR1000 
RevealedJanuary 2014September 2012More recent by 15 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S9200

		

		

			
 EX-ZR1000 Fujifilm S9200 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither includes Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S9200 has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S9200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the Fujifilm S9200.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S9200 is 90 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S9200.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you may want to consider the launch date  of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR1000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography features
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography features
43
 has manual focus
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 provides face detect focus
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
37
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 supports face detect autofocus
 focusing manually not possible
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
 Fujifilm S9200 as a Street photography camera
68
 screen tilts up and down
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (255 grams)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
41
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 heavier than others in class (670 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography info
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography info
50
 incredible zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 provides tracking focus
 good battery (470 per charge)
 slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
55
 excellent zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 supports tracking focus
 great battery power (500 CIPA)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography features
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography features
70
 good battery (470 shots)
 lighter than average in class (255g)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 relatively wide (24mm)
 long zoom (300mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 display isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
54
 great battery power (500 CIPA)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 really wide (24mm)
 very long reach (1200mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 heavier than others in class (670 grams)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9200
51
 has manual focus
 relatively wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 good battery (470 shots)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 missing Time Lapse mode
44
 really wide (24mm)
 decent sized screen (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 great battery power (500 CIPA)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging advice
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging advice
34
 relatively wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect focus
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than average in class (255g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 missing mic jack
26
 really wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 supports face detect autofocus
 high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
 no mic socket
 heavier than others in class (670g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S9200
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000Fujifilm FinePix S9200
General Information
Manufacturer Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Fujifilm FinePix S9200
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-09-25 2014-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 97%
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1700 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 7.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 255g (0.56 pounds) 670g (1.48 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 images 500 images
Style of battery Battery Pack AA
Battery ID NP-130 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $572 $300