Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135
90 Imaging
38 Features
53 Overall
44
92 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the C135 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 9 months later than the C135 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR1000 scores versus the C135 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Kodak EasyShare C135. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Kodak C135
| EX-ZR1000 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 9 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| C135 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak C135
| EX-ZR1000 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has exterior dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the C135.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and C135 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and C135.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR1000 to resolve more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR1000 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-09-25 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 175 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $572 | $0 |