Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
90 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Announced July 2009
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak M580, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the M580 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 3 years after the M580 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-ZR1000 scores versus the M580 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Kodak EasyShare M580. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Kodak M580
EX-ZR1000 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 39 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
M580 | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak M580
EX-ZR1000 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Kodak M580 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak M580 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the M580.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and M580 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and M580.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR1000 to offer you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR1000 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak M580 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2009-07-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 150g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $572 | $169 |