Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Kodak Z915, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and Z915 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 3 years later than the Z915 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR1000 scores vs the Z915 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR1000 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| Z915 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR1000 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Kodak Z915 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR1000 versus the Z915.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and Z915 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and Z915.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR1000 to deliver more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR1000 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $572 | $200 |