Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR1000/Casio-EX-ZR1000-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix P7700 front Nikon Coolpix P7700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700/Nikon-P7700-front.jpg)
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Released May 2013
- Previous Model is Nikon P7100
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Nikon P7700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and P7700 (12MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and P7700 (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR1000 was brought out 8 months prior to the P7700 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up against the P7700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Nikon Coolpix P7700. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Nikon P7700
EX-ZR1000 | P7700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
P7700 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | September 2012 | Newer by 8 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Nikon P7700
EX-ZR1000 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 enjoys external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Nikon P7700 has measurements of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") with a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Nikon P7700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the P7700.
![Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR1000-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and P7700 is 90 and 82 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR1000-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and P7700.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR1000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-ZR1000 will give you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR1000-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR1000-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2013-05-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 392g (0.86 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 191 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | 330 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $572 | $499 |