Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
38 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
Nikon S800c
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Revealed February 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the S800c (16MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 4 months prior to the S800c which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the S800c for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Nikon Coolpix S800c. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Nikon S800c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Nikon S800c
| EX-ZR1000 | S800c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| S800c | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 819k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+358k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Nikon S800c
| EX-ZR1000 | S800c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | February 2013 | Similar generation |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Nikon S800c has specifications of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the S800c.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and S800c is 90 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and S800c.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures though you really should take the production date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography info
Nikon S800c Portrait photography info
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S800c as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography details
Nikon S800c Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (140 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography information
Nikon S800c Travel photography information
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (250mm)
no Time Lapse function
bad battery (140 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography information
Nikon S800c Landscape photography information
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
pretty wide (25mm)
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery (140 per charge)
no Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging factors
Nikon S800c Vlogging factors
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon S800c Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix S800c | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix S800c |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2013-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 819k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 184 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 140 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $572 | $290 |