Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus SH-50, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the SH-50 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was introduced 3 months prior to the SH-50 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the SH-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus SH-50. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus SH-50
| EX-ZR1000 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| SH-50 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus SH-50
| EX-ZR1000 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has sizing of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus SH-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the SH-50.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and SH-50 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and SH-50.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of images but you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography details
Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Street photography with Olympus SH-50
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (255g)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (269g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography advice
Olympus SH-50 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
good battery power (470 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography features
Olympus SH-50 Travel photography features
good battery power (470 shots)
lighter than competition (255g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (269g)
provides touch to focus
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SH-50 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good battery power (470 CIPA)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging details
Olympus SH-50 Vlogging details
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (255g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of mic support
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (269 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus SH-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus SH-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $572 | $300 |