Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe EX-ZR1000 was revealed 4 years prior to the SH-3 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR1000 grades vs the SH-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus SH-3
EX-ZR1000 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
SH-3 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | September 2012 | Newer by 41 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus SH-3
EX-ZR1000 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features outer dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the SH-3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and SH-3 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and SH-3.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos although you really should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR1000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 380 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $572 | $579 |