Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR1000 was released 2 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-ZR1000 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 34 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| Tough-3000 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-ZR1000 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got outer measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the Tough-3000.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and Tough-3000 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR1000 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR1000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $572 | $0 |