Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 9 months after the TG-320 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR1000 grades against the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus TG-320
EX-ZR1000 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | January 2012 | Newer by 9 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
TG-320 | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-320
EX-ZR1000 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the TG-320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and TG-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and TG-320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR1000 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR1000 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 150 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $572 | $0 |