Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-810, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR1000 was manufactured 14 months later than the TG-810 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the TG-810 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus TG-810. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR1000 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 14 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| TG-810 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR1000 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus TG-810 has measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-810 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the TG-810.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and TG-810 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The visual underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and TG-810.
All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR1000 to render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR1000 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-810 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-810 as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (255g)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-810 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
good battery pack (470 per charge)
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography features
Olympus TG-810 Travel photography features
good battery pack (470 per charge)
lighter than average in class (255 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery (220 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-810 Landscape photography factors
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
good battery pack (470 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
environment proof
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery (220 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR1000
Vlogging with Olympus TG-810
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (255g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have microphone jack
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone support
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-09-25 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $572 | $428 |