Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 9 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the TG-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-ZR1000 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| TG-2 iHS | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | September 2012 | More recent by 9 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-ZR1000 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and TG-2 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR1000 to produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR1000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography information
Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography information
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (255g)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-2 iHS Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
no Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
great battery pack (350 per charge)
weather sealing
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging info
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone port
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone socket
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-09-25 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $572 | $380 |