Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus VR-340, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 9 months after the VR-340 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus VR-340
EX-ZR1000 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | January 2012 | More modern by 9 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
VR-340 | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus VR-340
EX-ZR1000 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the VR-340.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and VR-340 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and VR-340.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos though you have to take the production date of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR1000 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus VR-340 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $572 | $130 |