Clicky

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
53
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-ZR1000 was introduced 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 EX-ZR1000 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedSeptember 2012November 2009Newer by 35 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-ZR1000

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro EX-ZR1000 
Screen resolution920k461kSharper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 EX-ZR1000 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got outside dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR1000 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-ZR1000 will resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR1000 should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography information
43
focusing manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
55
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution (12MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography highlights
68
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (255g)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
62
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography features
50
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (470 shots)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
terrible battery life (320 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography features
70
better than average battery life (470 shots)
lighter than others (255 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
49
flash built-in
terrible battery life (320 CIPA)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography highlights
51
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
better than average battery life (470 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
46
focusing manually
good sized screen (3 inch)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
terrible battery life (320 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR1000
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
34
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (255g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic jack
20
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-25 2009-11-10
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 50mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 255 gr (0.56 pounds) 453 gr (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos 320 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $572 $566