Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aa98/9aa982410c7510bfbc83a3262c181859101131e1" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b2c4/4b2c48a59424bf7e9398646eaf9b305a09be3d25" alt="Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-ZR1000 was revealed 24 months earlier than the WG-30 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 scores vs the WG-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-ZR1000 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
WG-30 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-ZR1000 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR1000 versus the WG-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be316/be31672e23b2084520efc036189608b8354af925" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-30 is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/162e6/162e684a46f1065e2f541e74b129f6df59caf4ed" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-30.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of files although you should always factor the release date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR1000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42be9/42be994a0417b50acfd44588acd326a2df21120f" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a906/2a906ecf3b613369b43f744191305599888f41e9" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $572 | $428 |