Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR1000 was announced 16 months earlier than the WG-4 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR1000 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| WG-4 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | September 2012 | Newer by 16 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR1000 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR1000 versus the WG-4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-4.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photographs but you should always consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography features
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography features
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (255g)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
low fps (2.0 fps)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery power (240 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography factors
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition (255 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
environment sealing
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery power (240 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography info
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery power (240 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR1000
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (255 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $572 | $330 |