Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR1000 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR1000 scores versus the WG-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-ZR1000 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
WG-50 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 56 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-ZR1000 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 enjoys exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the WG-50.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-50.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos however you will want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR1000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 300 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $572 | $280 |