Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 6 years before the WG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 grades vs the WG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Ricoh WG-6. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR1000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| WG-6 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | September 2012 | More modern by 65 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Clearer screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR1000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the WG-6.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-6 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-6.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-6 to deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 246g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $572 | $271 |