Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 6 years before the WG-6 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 grades vs the WG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Ricoh WG-6. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR1000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| WG-6 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | September 2012 | More modern by 65 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Clearer screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-ZR1000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the WG-6.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-6 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-6.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-6 to deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 246g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $572 | $271 |