Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as WB5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung HZ25W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 2 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the HZ25W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung HZ25W
| EX-ZR1000 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 28 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| HZ25W | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung HZ25W
| EX-ZR1000 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the HZ25W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and HZ25W.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR1000 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR1000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also Known as | - | WB5000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 428 grams (0.94 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $572 | $350 |