Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Announced May 2014
- Replaced the Samsung NX2000
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX3000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is very close but the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR1000 was released 20 months earlier than the NX3000 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 scores versus the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX3000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung NX3000
EX-ZR1000 | NX3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
NX3000 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2014 | September 2012 | More recent by 20 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX3000
EX-ZR1000 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 461k | 461k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has specifications of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX3000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the NX3000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and NX3000 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and NX3000.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR1000 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX3000 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR1000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung NX3000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-25 | 2014-05-26 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 370 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $572 | $897 |