Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Launched February 2015
- Older Model is Samsung NX300

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung NX500, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and NX500 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-ZR1000 was launched 3 years before the NX500 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR1000 grades against the NX500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX500. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung NX500
EX-ZR1000 | NX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
NX500 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 28 months |
Display resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+575k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX500
EX-ZR1000 | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung NX500 has proportions of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung NX500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the NX500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and NX500 is 90 and 87 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and NX500.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR1000 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX500 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung NX500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 28MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6480 x 4320 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 209 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.265 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 287 gr (0.63 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 87 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 370 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $572 | $800 |