Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST90, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the ST90 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 21 months after the ST90 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR1000 grades against the ST90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST90. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung ST90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung ST90
| EX-ZR1000 | ST90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 21 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| ST90 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST90
| EX-ZR1000 | ST90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 enjoys external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung ST90 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST90 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the ST90.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and ST90 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and ST90.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR1000 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR1000 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST90 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST90 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-09-25 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $572 | $150 |