Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed April 2011
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung ST93, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR1000 was revealed 18 months later than the ST93 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the ST93 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST93. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung ST93
EX-ZR1000 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | April 2011 | More recent by 18 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
ST93 | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST93
EX-ZR1000 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers outside measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung ST93 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the ST93.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and ST93 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and ST93.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of images although you need to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-ZR1000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST93 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-09-25 | 2011-04-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $572 | - |