Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 3 months earlier than the WB250F which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR1000 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| WB250F | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR1000 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers outside measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the WB250F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WB250F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and WB250F.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR1000 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
MP count decent (14MP)
has face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography advice
Samsung WB250F Street photography advice
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (255g)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (226g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Sports photography with Samsung WB250F
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
good battery (470 shots)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Travel photography camera
good battery (470 shots)
lighter than average in class (255 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others in class (226g)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (432mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
good battery (470 per charge)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB250F Vlogging highlights
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (255 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic support
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (226 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $250 |