Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 3 months earlier than the WB800F so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR1000 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| WB800F | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR1000 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has physical dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos however you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
provides face detection focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Street photography highlights
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (255 grams)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
better than average battery (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors (255 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography details
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
better than average battery (470 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
quite wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB800F as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (255g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic port
quite wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (218 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
does not have external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $572 | $300 |