Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 16 months earlier than the DP2 Quattro which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-ZR1000 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-ZR1000
DP2 Quattro | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | September 2012 | More modern by 16 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-ZR1000 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the DP2 Quattro.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR1000 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $572 | $931 |