Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) possess different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 4 years prior to the Quattro H and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the Quattro H with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Sigma Quattro H
EX-ZR1000 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-ZR1000
Quattro H | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | September 2012 | More recent by 41 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 461k | Crisper display (+1159k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Sigma Quattro H
EX-ZR1000 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Sigma Quattro H in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the Quattro H.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and Quattro H is 90 and 78 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and Quattro H.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR1000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will give extra detail utilizing its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 45MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $572 | $1,134 |