Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR15 and FujiFilm S200EXR, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and S200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") posses different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR15 was manufactured 2 years later than the S200EXR and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR15 scores versus the S200EXR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR15 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR15
S200EXR | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR15 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the FujiFilm S200EXR has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 and FujiFilm S200EXR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the S200EXR.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and S200EXR is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The graphic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and S200EXR.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR15 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR15 will result in extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR15 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
Also called | - | FinePix S205EXR |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 7.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | NP-140 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $249 | $500 |