Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45935/45935cd57d74e35c1f19875df2e85c33ee5d58cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9207c/9207c00abb1a3f512690da028260fac624b4f599" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-ZR15 was revealed 2 years after the Fujifilm F200EXR which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the Fujifilm F200EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 33 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR15
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 features physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Fujifilm F200EXR has sizing of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the Fujifilm F200EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0b0a/d0b0a11a7f8b02ba5aeda51f569e97b48debde71" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 93 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0bee/e0bee91a40e7229c59f6b0269181996ea0ef451e" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR15 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Casio EX-ZR15 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR15 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d9bd/8d9bdd88a770ff1b1875c4e292940c8c9e199c20" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73b71/73b71d01f476ea40edcfed4f80e424438e73abd4" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2009-04-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $249 | $350 |