Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Fujifilm XP200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was launched 14 months earlier than the Fujifilm XP200 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR15 scores against the Fujifilm XP200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Fujifilm XP200
EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Casio EX-ZR15
Fujifilm XP200 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 14 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Fujifilm XP200
EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Fujifilm XP200 has proportions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Fujifilm XP200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the Fujifilm XP200.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and Fujifilm XP200 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and Fujifilm XP200.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR15 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2013-03-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $249 | $250 |