Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
30 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Kodak C140, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-ZR15 was released 3 years after the C140 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the C140 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Kodak C140
| EX-ZR15 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| C140 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Kodak C140
| EX-ZR15 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has proportions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Kodak C140 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the C140.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and C140 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and C140.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR15 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Casio EX-ZR15 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 8MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 13cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $249 | $80 |