Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Kodak C140, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR15 was released 3 years after the C140 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the C140 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Kodak C140
| EX-ZR15 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| C140 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Kodak C140
| EX-ZR15 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has proportions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Kodak C140 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the C140.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and C140 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and C140.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR15 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Casio EX-ZR15 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 8MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 13cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $249 | $80 |