Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Announced July 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the M580 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR15 was introduced 2 years later than the M580 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the M580 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Kodak EasyShare M580. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Kodak M580
| EX-ZR15 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| M580 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Kodak M580
| EX-ZR15 | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Kodak M580 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the M580.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and M580 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and M580.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to show greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR15 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak M580 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 150g (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $249 | $169 |