Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Kodak Sport, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and Sport (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR15 was manufactured 13 months later than the Sport which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR15 scores against the Sport in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Kodak EasyShare Sport. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Kodak Sport
| EX-ZR15 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Crisper screen (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Casio EX-ZR15
| Sport | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Kodak Sport
| EX-ZR15 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Kodak Sport in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the Sport.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and Sport is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and Sport.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR15 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR15 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $249 | $155 |