Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR15 was introduced 20 months after the Z950 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR15 scores versus the Z950 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Kodak Z950
| EX-ZR15 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| Z950 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Kodak Z950
| EX-ZR15 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the Z950.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and Z950 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and Z950.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to produce greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR15 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 243 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $249 | $250 |