Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus FE-5010, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR15 was released 3 years after the FE-5010 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the FE-5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus FE-5010. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus FE-5010
| EX-ZR15 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| FE-5010 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus FE-5010
| EX-ZR15 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5010 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus FE-5010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the FE-5010.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and FE-5010 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and FE-5010.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR15 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus FE-5010 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 130 grams (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $249 | $130 |