Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus SH-1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 3 years before the SH-1 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR15 scores versus the SH-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus SH-1
| EX-ZR15 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| SH-1 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 27 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus SH-1
| EX-ZR15 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with outer measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-1 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus SH-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the SH-1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and SH-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and SH-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should really take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $249 | $349 |