Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR15 was launched 5 years prior to the SH-3 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the SH-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus SH-3
| EX-ZR15 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| SH-3 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | January 2012 | Newer by 49 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus SH-3
| EX-ZR15 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the SH-3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and SH-3 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and SH-3.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files though you have to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $249 | $579 |