Clicky

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020

Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2012
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR15 was announced 24 months later than the 6020 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus 6020

					

					

						
 EX-ZR15 6020 
IntroducedJanuary 2012February 2010More recent by 24 months
Manual focus  More exact focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Casio EX-ZR15

					

					

						
 6020 EX-ZR15 
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus 6020

					

					

						
 EX-ZR15 6020 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither comes with Touch friendly screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with outer measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the 6020.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and 6020 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and 6020.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to give greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR15 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

						Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
40
 you can focus manually
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 provides face detect focusing
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
27
 MP count good (13 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 lack of manual mode
 can't use external flash
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Street photography with Olympus 6020
57
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no articulating screen
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competitors (122 grams)
 no articulating screen
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Sports photography with Olympus 6020
44
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 provides tracking focus
 great battery life (325 CIPA)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
42
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (13MP)
 offers tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR15 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus 6020 as a Travel photography camera
67
 great battery life (325 CIPA)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 has built in flash
 rather wide (28mm)
 lack of Time Lapse recording
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
70
 lighter than competitors (122 grams)
 environment proof
 MP count good (13 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (28mm)
 missing Timelapse recording
 doesn't have selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR15 as a Landscape photography camera
 Olympus 6020 as a Landscape photography camera
49
 you can focus manually
 rather wide (28mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 great battery life (325 CIPA)
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 no manual control
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 lack of Time Lapse recording
40
 fairly wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (13 megapixels)
 environment proof
 manual focus not available
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
 lack of manual mode
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 missing Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Vlogging factors
Olympus 6020 Vlogging factors
33
 rather wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect focusing
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of mic socket
31
 fairly wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (122g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
 doesn't have selfie friendly display
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 missing external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
				
								
				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus 6020
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR15Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Also called as - mju Tough 6020
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2012-01-09 2010-02-02
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 13 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-196mm (7.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 2cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 1/4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 5.20 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 176 gr (0.39 lbs) 122 gr (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 325 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-110 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $249 $279