Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR15 was announced 2 years later than the 8000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the 8000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus 8000
| EX-ZR15 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| 8000 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus 8000
| EX-ZR15 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the 8000.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and 8000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and 8000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR15 to render extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 182g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $249 | $380 |