Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 8010
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR15 was unveiled 24 months later than the 8010 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR15 matches up versus the 8010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus 8010
EX-ZR15 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | February 2010 | Fresher by 24 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Casio EX-ZR15
8010 | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus 8010
EX-ZR15 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the 8010.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and 8010 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and 8010.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR15 to resolve more detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $249 | $600 |