Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR15 was manufactured 13 months later than the TG-310 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus TG-310
| EX-ZR15 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| TG-310 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus TG-310
| EX-ZR15 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the TG-310.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and TG-310 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and TG-310.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR15 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competition (155g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery life (325 shots)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography advice
good battery life (325 shots)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition (155g)
weather proofing
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery life (150 shots)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography information
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good battery life (325 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
bad battery life (150 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | 150 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $249 | $0 |