Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR15 was unveiled 4 months before the TG-1 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the TG-1 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
EX-ZR15 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR15
TG-1 iHS | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 610k | 461k | Sharper display (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
EX-ZR15 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | May 2012 | Same generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and TG-1 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and TG-1 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR15 to provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2012-05-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | 350 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $249 | $399 |