Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus VH-515, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR15 was released 7 months before the VH-515 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the VH-515 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus VH-515. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus VH-515
EX-ZR15 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Casio EX-ZR15
VH-515 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | January 2012 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus VH-515
EX-ZR15 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus VH-515 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the VH-515.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and VH-515 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and VH-515.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR15 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus VH-515 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $249 | $648 |